Write in a clean editor, then format for Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice in one click — DocuGuru applies the official Wiley template with author–year references and exports a submission-ready PDF plus the editable LaTeX source. Free to start.
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice is a peer-reviewed journal published by Wiley, covering Health Policy Implementation Science, Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life, Primary Care and Health Outcomes.
| Publisher | Wiley |
|---|---|
| Reference style | Author–year (Chicago) Author–year — (Smith, 2023) in the text Smith, Ada, Ben Jones, and Cara Lee. 2023. "A Representative Article Title." Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 12 (3): 45–58.
Formats any DOI in Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice style. No sign-up. |
| Publishes research in | Health Policy Implementation Science Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life Primary Care and Health Outcomes Clinical practice guidelines implementation Meta-analysis and systematic reviews |
| ISSN | 1356-1294 |
| Citation impact (2-yr) | 1.83 |
| h-index | 115 |
| i10-index | 2,240 |
| Total citations | 107,774 |
| Article processing charge | $4,020 |
| Top institutions publishing here | University of Toronto |
| Journal website | onlinelibrary.wiley.com |
| You get | A submission-ready PDF and the editable LaTeX source — ready to submit. |
Citations each year’s papers have accumulated so far — the most recent years are still building up.
RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The diversity of the population worldwide suggests a great need for cross-culturally validated research instruments or scales. Researchers and clinicians must have access to reliable and valid measures of concepts of interest in their own cultures and languages to conduct cross-cultural research and/or provide quality patient care. Although there are well-established…
Pilot studies play an important role in health research, but they can be misused, mistreated and misrepresented. In this paper we focus on pilot studies that are used specifically to plan a randomized controlled trial (RCT). Citing examples from the literature, we provide a methodological framework in which to work, and discuss reasons why a…
RATIONALE, AIMS, AND OBJECTIVES: Systematic reviews combining qualitative, quantitative, and/or mixed methods studies are increasingly popular because of their potential for addressing complex interventions and phenomena, specifically for assessing and improving clinical practice. A major challenge encountered with this type of review is the appraisal of the quality of individual studies given the heterogeneity of…
UNLABELLED: RATIONALE, AIMS & OBJECTIVE: Tools for the assessment of the quality of research studies tend to be specific to a particular research design (e.g. randomized controlled trials, or qualitative interviews). This makes it difficult to assess the quality of a body of research that addresses the same or a similar research question but using…
Statistical tests of heterogeneity and bias, in particular publication bias, are very popular in meta-analyses. These tests use statistical approaches whose limitations are often not recognized. Moreover, it is often implied with inappropriate confidence that these tests can provide reliable answers to questions that in essence are not of statistical nature. Statistical heterogeneity is only…
