Bulletin of Economic Research Template
Write in a clean editor, then format for Bulletin of Economic Research in one click — DocuGuru applies the official Wiley template with author–year references and exports a submission-ready PDF plus the editable LaTeX source. Free to start.
About the Bulletin of Economic Research format
Bulletin of Economic Research is a peer-reviewed journal published by Wiley, covering Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth, Economic theories and models, Monetary Policy and Economic Impact.
| Publisher | Wiley |
|---|---|
| Reference style | Author–year (Chicago) Author–year — (Smith, 2023) in the text Smith, Ada, Ben Jones, and Cara Lee. 2023. "A Representative Article Title." Bulletin of Economic Research 12 (3): 45–58.
Formats any DOI in Bulletin of Economic Research style. No sign-up. |
| Publishes research in | Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth Economic theories and models Monetary Policy and Economic Impact Merger and Competition Analysis Economic Theory and Policy |
| ISSN | 0307-3378 |
| Citation impact (2-yr) | 0.99 |
| h-index | 56 |
| i10-index | 401 |
| Total citations | 16,552 |
| Article processing charge | $2,630 |
| Top institutions publishing here | University of Leeds |
| Journal website | onlinelibrary.wiley.com |
| You get | A submission-ready PDF and the editable LaTeX source — ready to submit. |
Papers published in Bulletin of Economic Research per year
Citation impact of Bulletin of Economic Research by publication year
Citations each year’s papers have accumulated so far — the most recent years are still building up.
Most-cited papers in Bulletin of Economic Research
The paper discusses three econometric problems that are rarely given adequate discussion in textbooks: model uncertainty, parameter heterogeneity, and outliers. Leamer’s extreme bounds analysis can be adapted to address all three problems simultaneously. Two examples are presented based on an influential cross‐country growth paper by Levine and Renelt ( American Economic Review , vol. 82,…
ABSTRACT The literatures on the assessment of income distributions and on differences in needs are not well integrated. The theoretical literature providing results about evaluations and comparisons of income distributions does not, in the main, consider the implications of non‐income differences between income‐receiving units, while the equivalence scale literature providing results about the relationship between…