Wiley

Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society Template

Write in a clean editor, then format for Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society in one click — DocuGuru applies the official Wiley template with author–year references and exports a submission-ready PDF plus the editable LaTeX source. Free to start.

About the Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society format

Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society is a peer-reviewed journal published by Wiley, covering Plant and animal studies, Animal Behavior and Reproduction, Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies.

PublisherWiley
Reference styleAuthor–year (Chicago)
Author–year — (Smith, 2023) in the text
Smith, Ada, Ben Jones, and Cara Lee. 2023. "A Representative Article Title." Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 12 (3): 45–58.

Formats any DOI in Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society style. No sign-up.

Publishes research inPlant and animal studies Animal Behavior and Reproduction Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
ISSN0006-3231
Citation impact (2-yr)10.41
h-index303
i10-index2,607
Total citations416,611
Article processing charge$4,890
Top institutions publishing hereCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Journal websiteonlinelibrary.wiley.com
You getA submission-ready PDF and the editable LaTeX source — ready to submit.

Papers published in Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society per year

99
2014
80
2015
78
2016
75
2017
105
2018
91
2019
108
2020
153
2021
108
2022
121
2023
139
2024
146
2025

Citation impact of Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society by publication year

18.5K
2014
12K
2015
12K
2016
9.3K
2017
16.1K
2018
8.7K
2019
10.8K
2020
9.9K
2021
7.4K
2022
3.7K
2023
2.8K
2024
768
2025

Citations each year’s papers have accumulated so far — the most recent years are still building up.

Most-cited papers in Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society

Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges

David Dudgeon, Angela H. Arthington, Mark O. Gessner et al. · 12 Dec 2005

Freshwater biodiversity is the over-riding conservation priority during the International Decade for Action - 'Water for Life' - 2005 to 2015. Fresh water makes up only 0.01% of the World's water and approximately 0.8% of the Earth's surface, yet this tiny fraction of global water supports at least 100000 species out of approximately 1.8 million…

8,325 citations Cite SaveGo to paper →
THE MAINTENANCE OF SPECIES‐RICHNESS IN PLANT COMMUNITIES: THE IMPORTANCE OF THE REGENERATION NICHE

P. J. Grubb · 1 Feb 1977

SUMMARY According to ‘Gause's hypothesis’ a corollary of the process of evolution by natural selection is that in a community at equilibrium every species must occupy a different niche. Many botanists have found this idea improbable because they have ignored the processes of regeneration in plant communities. Most plant communities are longer‐lived than their constituent…

4,431 citations Cite SaveGo to paper →
Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists

Shinichi Nakagawa, Innes C. Cuthill · 18 Oct 2007

Null hypothesis significance testing (NHST) is the dominant statistical approach in biology, although it has many, frequently unappreciated, problems. Most importantly, NHST does not provide us with two crucial pieces of information: (1) the magnitude of an effect of interest, and (2) the precision of the estimate of the magnitude of that effect. All biologists…

3,840 citations Cite SaveGo to paper →

Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society template — frequently asked questions

How do I write a paper in the Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society format?
In DocuGuru you write your manuscript in a normal editor — no LaTeX setup required — and select the Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society template. When you export, DocuGuru compiles the paper into the official Wiley format and hands you a submission-ready PDF along with the editable LaTeX source.
What reference style does Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society use?
Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society uses Author–year (Chicago) references, shown as author–year markers such as (Smith, 2023) in the text. DocuGuru formats every in-text citation and the reference list in this exact style automatically. A reference appears like this: Smith, Ada, Ben Jones, and Cara Lee. 2023. "A Representative Article Title." Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 12 (3): 45–58.
Do I need to know LaTeX to submit to Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society?
No. DocuGuru generates the USG LaTeX class and compiles the PDF for you in the background, so you get a Wiley-ready Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society document without writing any LaTeX. If you do want it, the LaTeX source is included in the export.
Can I import an existing draft into the Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society template?
Yes. Paste or upload your current manuscript — Word, LaTeX, Markdown, or plain text — and DocuGuru reflows it into the Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society format with correct headings, figures, tables, and author–year citations.
Who publishes Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society?
Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society is a multidisciplinary journal published by Wiley. DocuGuru's Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society template matches Wiley's official submission format.
Can I export a submission-ready Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society PDF?
Yes — DocuGuru produces a PDF built with the official Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society template (the USG class) that is ready to submit to Wiley, together with the matching LaTeX source files.
How much does the Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society template cost?
You can start writing in the Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society template for free. Exporting the final submission-ready Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society PDF and LaTeX source is part of DocuGuru's paid plans — see the app for current pricing.
Use the Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society template