Freshwater biodiversity is the over-riding conservation priority during the International Decade for Action - 'Water for Life' - 2005 to 2015. Fresh water makes up only 0.01% of the World's water and approximately 0.8% of the Earth's surface, yet this tiny fraction of global water supports at least 100000 species out of approximately 1.8 million…
Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society Template
Write in a clean editor, then format for Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society in one click — DocuGuru applies the official Wiley template with author–year references and exports a submission-ready PDF plus the editable LaTeX source. Free to start.
About the Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society format
Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society is a peer-reviewed journal published by Wiley, covering Plant and animal studies, Animal Behavior and Reproduction, Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies.
| Publisher | Wiley |
|---|---|
| Reference style | Author–year (Chicago) Author–year — (Smith, 2023) in the text Smith, Ada, Ben Jones, and Cara Lee. 2023. "A Representative Article Title." Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 12 (3): 45–58.
Formats any DOI in Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society style. No sign-up. |
| Publishes research in | Plant and animal studies Animal Behavior and Reproduction Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior Wildlife Ecology and Conservation |
| ISSN | 0006-3231 |
| Citation impact (2-yr) | 10.41 |
| h-index | 303 |
| i10-index | 2,607 |
| Total citations | 416,611 |
| Article processing charge | $4,890 |
| Top institutions publishing here | Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique |
| Journal website | onlinelibrary.wiley.com |
| You get | A submission-ready PDF and the editable LaTeX source — ready to submit. |
Papers published in Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society per year
Citation impact of Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society by publication year
Citations each year’s papers have accumulated so far — the most recent years are still building up.
Most-cited papers in Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
SUMMARY According to ‘Gause's hypothesis’ a corollary of the process of evolution by natural selection is that in a community at equilibrium every species must occupy a different niche. Many botanists have found this idea improbable because they have ignored the processes of regeneration in plant communities. Most plant communities are longer‐lived than their constituent…
Null hypothesis significance testing (NHST) is the dominant statistical approach in biology, although it has many, frequently unappreciated, problems. Most importantly, NHST does not provide us with two crucial pieces of information: (1) the magnitude of an effect of interest, and (2) the precision of the estimate of the magnitude of that effect. All biologists…