Write in a clean editor, then format for Thinking & Reasoning in one click — DocuGuru applies the official Taylor & Francis template with author–year references and exports a submission-ready PDF plus the editable LaTeX source. Free to start.
Thinking & Reasoning is a peer-reviewed journal published by Taylor & Francis, covering Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics, Child and Animal Learning Development, Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment.
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis |
|---|---|
| Reference style | Author–year (Chicago, T&F) Author–year — (Smith, 2023) in the text Smith, Ada, Ben Jones, and Cara Lee. 2023. "A Representative Article Title." Thinking & Reasoning 12 (3): 45–58.
Formats any DOI in Thinking & Reasoning style. No sign-up. |
| Publishes research in | Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics Child and Animal Learning Development Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference |
| ISSN | 1354-6783 |
| Citation impact (2-yr) | 1.7 |
| h-index | 81 |
| i10-index | 404 |
| Total citations | 24,622 |
| Top institutions publishing here | Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique |
| Journal website | www.tandfonline.com |
| You get | A submission-ready PDF and the editable LaTeX source — ready to submit. |
Citations each year’s papers have accumulated so far — the most recent years are still building up.
The Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT; Frederick, 2005) is designed to measure the tendency to override a prepotent response alternative that is incorrect and to engage in further reflection that leads to the correct response. It is a prime measure of the miserly information processing posited by most dual process theories. The original three-item test may…
We hypothesised that belief in conspiracy theories would be predicted by the general tendency to attribute agency and intentionality where it is unlikely to exist. We further hypothesised that this tendency would explain the relationship between education level and belief in conspiracy theories, where lower levels of education have been found to be associated with…
In this study, we examine the belief bias effect in syllogistic reasoning under both standard presentation and in a condition where participants are required to respond within 10 seconds. As predicted, the requirement for rapid responding increased the amount of belief bias observed on the task and reduced the number of logically correct decisions, both…
Intuitive-automatic processes are crucial for making judgements and decisions. The fascinating complexity of these processes has attracted many decision researchers, prompting them to start investigating intuition empirically and to develop numerous models. Dual-process models assume a clear distinction between intuitive and deliberate processes but provide no further differentiation within both categories. We go beyond these…
In this paper, I show that the question of how dual process theories of reasoning and judgement account for conflict between System 1 (heuristic) and System 2 (analytic) processes needs to be explicated and addressed in future research work. I demonstrate that a simple additive probability model that describes such conflict can be mapped on…
Journal of Applied Statistics
Journal of Modern Optics
Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation
Materials Research Letters
Numerical Heat Transfer, Part A: Applications
Quality Engineering
Science and Technology of Advanced Materials
Stochastics: An International Journal of Probability and Stochastic Processes
