(1973). The Elements of Programming Style. The Journal of Data Education: Vol. 13, New Orleans Convention April 17th to 20th, 1973, pp. 28-29.
The Journal of Data Education Template
Write in a clean editor, then format for The Journal of Data Education in one click — DocuGuru applies the official Taylor & Francis template with author–year references and exports a submission-ready PDF plus the editable LaTeX source. Free to start.
About the The Journal of Data Education format
The Journal of Data Education is a peer-reviewed journal published by Taylor & Francis, covering Statistics Education and Methodologies, Human auditory perception and evaluation, Online Learning and Analytics.
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis |
|---|---|
| Reference style | Author–year (Chicago, T&F) Author–year — (Smith, 2023) in the text Smith, Ada, Ben Jones, and Cara Lee. 2023. "A Representative Article Title." The Journal of Data Education 12 (3): 45–58.
Formats any DOI in The Journal of Data Education style. No sign-up. |
| Publishes research in | Statistics Education and Methodologies Human auditory perception and evaluation Online Learning and Analytics Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies Educational Robotics and Engineering |
| ISSN | 0022-0310 |
| h-index | 6 |
| i10-index | 4 |
| Total citations | 311 |
| Top institutions publishing here | James Madison University |
| Journal website | www.tandfonline.com |
| You get | A submission-ready PDF and the editable LaTeX source — ready to submit. |
Papers published in The Journal of Data Education per year
Citation impact of The Journal of Data Education by publication year
Citations each year’s papers have accumulated so far — the most recent years are still building up.
Most-cited papers in The Journal of Data Education
(1982). The Behavioral Antecedents of Computer Fear. The Journal of Data Education: Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 7-9.
MIS research is emerging as an eclectic and diverse body of literature. Frameworks have been developed to define and direct research efforts. Considerable variation in research methodology, however, creates problems of effective comparison and evaluation of merit by senior academics from more traditional fields called upon to apply standards for promotion and tenure of MIS…