Write in a clean editor, then format for Indian Law Review in one click — DocuGuru applies the official Taylor & Francis template with author–year references and exports a submission-ready PDF plus the editable LaTeX source. Free to start.
Indian Law Review is a peer-reviewed journal published by Taylor & Francis, covering Judicial and Constitutional Studies, South Asian Studies and Conflicts, Law in Society and Culture.
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis |
|---|---|
| Reference style | Author–year (Chicago, T&F) Author–year — (Smith, 2023) in the text Smith, Ada, Ben Jones, and Cara Lee. 2023. "A Representative Article Title." Indian Law Review 12 (3): 45–58.
Formats any DOI in Indian Law Review style. No sign-up. |
| Publishes research in | Judicial and Constitutional Studies South Asian Studies and Conflicts Law in Society and Culture Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies International Law and Human Rights |
| ISSN | 2473-0580 |
| Citation impact (2-yr) | 0.53 |
| h-index | 14 |
| i10-index | 19 |
| Total citations | 583 |
| Top institutions publishing here | O. P. Jindal Global University |
| Journal website | www.tandfonline.com |
| You get | A submission-ready PDF and the editable LaTeX source — ready to submit. |
Citations each year’s papers have accumulated so far — the most recent years are still building up.
The performance of obligations under a contract may be hindered by unexpected supervening events, leading to contractual uncertainties. The doctrine of frustration paves the way for a just consequence of such an unfortunate event, which has happened without any fault of the contracting parties. The doctrine fills the void in a contract regarding supervening events,…
This article offers a feminist critique of the Surrogacy (Regulation) Bill, 2019. Fifteen years since the first proposed regulation of assisted reproductive technologies and surrogacy, the 2019 Bill leaves much to be desired. It reflects a limited understanding of the complexities of surrogacy, is discriminatory in its approach, is plagued by lack of clarity, is…
This paper examines the provisions of the recently enacted Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019 (CAA) against the backdrop of the citizenship provisions of the Indian Constitution. It argues that by articulating a preference towards non-Muslim immigrants and discriminating against Muslim immigrants, the CAA is vaguely reminiscent of policies adopted by the Indian government at the time…
Some books are timely by design, others are fortuitously so. Few perhaps can aspire to being timely in three distinct ways, and Madhav Khosla’s India’s Founding Moment, a book about the making of I...
This article presents an empirical analysis of the Supreme Court’s discretionary appellate jurisdiction (triggered by a “special leave petition” or “SLP”). Based on an analysis of 1100 randomly selected civil SLP cases spread over 11 years, it argues that its expansive SLP docket has cannibalized the Court’s role as an effective constitutional court. It reveals…
