Taylor & Francis

Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology Template

Write in a clean editor, then format for Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology in one click — DocuGuru applies the official Taylor & Francis template with author–year references and exports a submission-ready PDF plus the editable LaTeX source. Free to start.

About the Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology format

Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology is a peer-reviewed journal published by Taylor & Francis, covering Social and Intergroup Psychology, Behavioral Health and Interventions, Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment.

PublisherTaylor & Francis
Reference styleAuthor–year (Chicago, T&F)
Author–year — (Smith, 2023) in the text
Smith, Ada, Ben Jones, and Cara Lee. 2023. "A Representative Article Title." Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology 12 (3): 45–58.

Formats any DOI in Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology style. No sign-up.

Publishes research inSocial and Intergroup Psychology Behavioral Health and Interventions Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics Cultural Differences and Values
ISSN2374-3603
Citation impact (2-yr)0.25
h-index20
i10-index32
Total citations1,316
Top institutions publishing hereTilburg University
Journal websitewww.tandfonline.com
You getA submission-ready PDF and the editable LaTeX source — ready to submit.

Papers published in Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology per year

1
2015
8
2016
16
2017
12
2018
17
2020
3
2021
5
2022
5
2023
4
2025

Citation impact of Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology by publication year

39
2015
179
2016
466
2017
367
2018
189
2020
19
2021
32
2022
19
2023
1
2025

Citations each year’s papers have accumulated so far — the most recent years are still building up.

Most-cited papers in Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology

The replicability crisis and public trust in psychological science

Farid Anvari, Daniël Lakens · 2 Sep 2018

Replication failures of past findings in several scientific disciplines, including psychology, medicine, and experimental economics, have created a “crisis of confidence” among scientists. Psychological science has been at the forefront of tackling these issues, with discussions about replication failures and scientific self-criticisms of questionable research practices (QRPs) increasingly taking place in public forums. How this…

The influence of gender stereotype threat on mathematics test scores of Dutch high school students: a registered report

Paulette Flore, Joris Mulder, Jelte M. Wicherts · 4 May 2018

The effects of gender stereotype threat on mathematical test performance in the classroom have been extensively studied in several cultural contexts. Theory predicts that stereotype threat lowers girls’ performance on mathematics tests, while leaving boys’ math performance unaffected. We conducted a large-scale stereotype threat experiment in Dutch high schools (N = 2064) to study the…

The influence of nudge transparency on the experience of autonomy

Jonas Wachner, Marieke A. Adriaanse, Denise de Ridder · 25 Aug 2020

ABSTRACT While nudges have been shown to be effective and are already being implemented, there is still a debate on the ethics of nudging. This debate specifically refers to the potential of nudges negatively affecting autonomy. It has been suggested that making a nudge transparent may resolve this issue. Whereas previous research has already demonstrated…

Do nudges make use of automatic processing? Unraveling the effects of a default nudge under type 1 and type 2 processing

Laurens van Gestel, Marieke A. Adriaanse, Denise T. D. de Ridder · 10 Sep 2020

Nudges have become increasingly popular among policymakers as a tool to stimulate desirable behavior for individuals or society. One of the most prevailing assumptions of nudges is that they make use of automatic processing. Yet, this assumption has received little attention in experimental research. In two preregistered and high powered studies, we investigated this hypothesized…

Cousins or conjoined twins: how different are meaning and happiness in everyday life?

Ryan Dwyer, Elizabeth W. Dunn, Hal E. Hershfield · 2 Sep 2017

Are experiences that bring meaning different from experiences that bring happiness? If so, do people seek out different experiences in pursuing meaning versus happiness? In an adversarial collaboration, we conducted three preregistered experiments (total N = 879) to address these questions. We asked participants to describe an experience from the past month (Study 1) or…

Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology template — frequently asked questions

How do I write a paper in the Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology format?
In DocuGuru you write your manuscript in a normal editor — no LaTeX setup required — and select the Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology template. When you export, DocuGuru compiles the paper into the official Taylor & Francis format and hands you a submission-ready PDF along with the editable LaTeX source.
What reference style does Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology use?
Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology uses Author–year (Chicago, T&F) references, shown as author–year markers such as (Smith, 2023) in the text. DocuGuru formats every in-text citation and the reference list in this exact style automatically. A reference appears like this: Smith, Ada, Ben Jones, and Cara Lee. 2023. "A Representative Article Title." Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology 12 (3): 45–58.
Do I need to know LaTeX to submit to Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology?
No. DocuGuru generates the interact LaTeX class and compiles the PDF for you in the background, so you get a Taylor & Francis-ready Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology document without writing any LaTeX. If you do want it, the LaTeX source is included in the export.
Can I import an existing draft into the Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology template?
Yes. Paste or upload your current manuscript — Word, LaTeX, Markdown, or plain text — and DocuGuru reflows it into the Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology format with correct headings, figures, tables, and author–year citations.
Who publishes Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology?
Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology is a multidisciplinary journal published by Taylor & Francis. DocuGuru's Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology template matches Taylor & Francis's official submission format.
Can I export a submission-ready Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology PDF?
Yes — DocuGuru produces a PDF built with the official Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology template (the interact class) that is ready to submit to Taylor & Francis, together with the matching LaTeX source files.
How much does the Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology template cost?
You can start writing in the Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology template for free. Exporting the final submission-ready Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology PDF and LaTeX source is part of DocuGuru's paid plans — see the app for current pricing.
Use the Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology template