Write in a clean editor, then format for Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy Public Money in one click — DocuGuru applies the official Taylor & Francis template with author–year references and exports a submission-ready PDF plus the editable LaTeX source. Free to start.
Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy Public Money is a peer-reviewed journal published by Taylor & Francis, covering Human auditory perception and evaluation, Educational Robotics and Engineering, Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism.
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis |
|---|---|
| Reference style | Author–year (Chicago, T&F) Author–year — (Smith, 2023) in the text Smith, Ada, Ben Jones, and Cara Lee. 2023. "A Representative Article Title." Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy Public Money 12 (3): 45–58.
Formats any DOI in Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy Public Money style. No sign-up. |
| Publishes research in | Human auditory perception and evaluation Educational Robotics and Engineering Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies Political and Economic history of UK and US |
| ISSN | 0261-1252 |
| h-index | 9 |
| i10-index | 8 |
| Total citations | 370 |
| Top institutions publishing here | London School of Economics and Political Science |
| You get | A submission-ready PDF and the editable LaTeX source — ready to submit. |
Citations each year’s papers have accumulated so far — the most recent years are still building up.
Wholesale privatisation through contracting‐out raises general issues both for the Departments and authorities responsible for the services and for central government in its role as guardian of the public interest in respect of fair trading and competition. A recent survey conducted from York University and published here for the first time, reveals that a number…
Ever since Labour came to power in the city, Liverpool has hovered on the brink of financial disaster. That it has survived so long is a tribute to the financial expertise of its officers, who have exploited every loop‐hole open to them, even in a tightly cash‐controlled authority.
Efforts to improve the performance of the public sector have concentrated on its economic efficiency. But we expect more both of the public sector itself and of Government's policies for it.
By a bureaucratic accident, the ‘board and lodging’ allowance of the supplementary benefits system has enabled central government to finance private residential and nursing home care for the elderly. The result is an unintended policy experiment which raises fundamental questions about the purposes and methods of the Welfare State.
Throughout the public sector attempts are being made to introduce merit rewards for managers, mimicking as far as possible the private sector. But research has shown that it is hard, even in the private sector, to introduce such schemes successfully. In the public sector, the difficulties are likely to be even greater.
