Write in a clean editor, then format for Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation in one click — DocuGuru applies the official Springer Nature template with superscript references and exports a submission-ready PDF plus the editable LaTeX source. Free to start.
Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation is a peer-reviewed journal published by Springer Nature, covering Evaluation and Performance Assessment, Educational Assessment and Improvement, Health Policy Implementation Science.
| Publisher | Springer Nature |
|---|---|
| Reference style | Superscript numbered (Nature) Superscript — small raised numerals in the text 1. Smith, A., Jones, B. & Lee, C. A representative article title. Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation 12, 45–58 (2023).
Formats any DOI in Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation style. No sign-up. |
| Publishes research in | Evaluation and Performance Assessment Educational Assessment and Improvement Health Policy Implementation Science Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation Community Health and Development |
| ISSN | 1556-8180 |
| Citation impact (2-yr) | 0.52 |
| h-index | 38 |
| i10-index | 104 |
| Total citations | 11,648 |
| Open access | Yes |
| Top institutions publishing here | Western Michigan University |
| Journal website | survey.ate.wmich.edu |
| You get | A submission-ready PDF and the editable LaTeX source — ready to submit. |
Citations each year’s papers have accumulated so far — the most recent years are still building up.
Background: In educational research, online survey has become one of the most popular methods of data collection. Academic researchers, including faculty and students, expect and require a good response rate to their research projects for reliable results. Purpose: In this paper, the authors examine a wide range of factors related to survey response rates in…
Volume 26, number 1 was the first issue of the American Journal of Evaluation (Volume 26, Number) with Robin Miller at the helm as Editor. There are 5 articles, plus 1 contribution each in “Forum,” “Methods Notes,” “The Historical Record,” and “Ethical Challenges.”
Background: Although McNemar Test is the most appropriate tool for analyzing pre-post differences in dichotomous items (e.g., “yes” or “no”, “correct” or “incorrect”, etc.), many scholars have noted the inappropriate use of Pearson’s Chi-square Test by researchers, including social scientists and evaluators, for the analysis of related or dependent dichotomous variables. Purpose: The goal of…
Originally published as Paper #8, Occasional Paper Series, December, 1976*Reprinted with permission of The Public Affairs Center, Dartmouth College.Preparation of this paper has been supported in part by grants from the Russell Sage Foundation and the National Science Foundation, Grant Number SOC-7103704-03. A version of this paper was presented to the Visegrad, Hungary, Conference on…
