Write in a clean editor, then format for The Journals of Gerontology Series B in one click — DocuGuru applies the official Oxford University Press template with author–year references and exports a submission-ready PDF plus the editable LaTeX source. Free to start.
The Journals of Gerontology Series B is a peer-reviewed journal published by Oxford University Press, covering Health disparities and outcomes, Aging and Gerontology Research, Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving.
| Publisher | Oxford University Press |
|---|---|
| Reference style | Author–year (OUP) Author–year — (Smith, 2023) in the text Smith, A., Jones, B. and Lee, C. (2023) 'A representative article title', The Journals of Gerontology Series B, 12(3), pp. 45–58.
Formats any DOI in the closest standard style — The Journals of Gerontology Series B has no published style definition, so this is an approximation. No sign-up. |
| Publishes research in | Health disparities and outcomes Aging and Gerontology Research Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes |
| ISSN | 1079-5014 |
| Citation impact (2-yr) | 2.64 |
| h-index | 226 |
| i10-index | 3,133 |
| Total citations | 262,990 |
| Article processing charge | $4,198 |
| Top institutions publishing here | University of Michigan |
| Journal website | academic.oup.com |
| You get | A submission-ready PDF and the editable LaTeX source — ready to submit. |
Citations each year’s papers have accumulated so far — the most recent years are still building up.
Age and cumulative advantage/disadvantage theory have obvious logical, theoretical, and empirical connections, because both are inherently and irreducibly related to the passage of time. Over the past 15 years, these connections have resulted in the elaboration and application of the cumulative advantage-disadvantage perspective in social gerontology, especially in relation to issues of heterogeneity and inequality.…
This meta-analysis integrates results from 229 studies on gender differences in caregiver psychological and physical health, caregiving stressors, and social resources. Contrary to common perceptions, gender differences in caregiving variables were small to very small. Women had higher levels of burden and depression, and lower levels of subjective well-being and physical health. They reported that…
OBJECTIVES: This study examines the similarity of cognitive assessments using 1 interview in a large population study, the Health and Retirement Study (HRS), and a subsample in which a detailed neuropsychiatric assessment has been performed (Aging, Demographics, and Memory Study [ADAMS]). METHODS: Respondents are diagnosed in ADAMS as demented, cognitively impaired without dementia (CIND), or…
OBJECTIVES: This study tests the effects of volunteering on the well-being of older adults, including the effect of level of engagement, the moderating effects of demographic and social factors, and the effects of the nature of the volunteer experience. METHODS: This is a secondary data analysis of three waves of data from the Americans' Changing…
In the first part of this article, a wide range of research is drawn upon to describe the process by which aging stereotypes are internalized in younger individuals and then become self-stereotypes when individuals reach old age. The second part consists of a review of the author's cross-cultural, experimental, and longitudinal research that examines the…
