Write in a clean editor, then format for The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine in one click — DocuGuru applies the official Oxford University Press template with author–year references and exports a submission-ready PDF plus the editable LaTeX source. Free to start.
The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine is a peer-reviewed journal published by Oxford University Press, covering Ethics in medical practice, Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare, Mental Health and Psychiatry.
| Publisher | Oxford University Press |
|---|---|
| Reference style | Author–year (OUP) Author–year — (Smith, 2023) in the text Smith, A., Jones, B. and Lee, C. (2023) 'A representative article title', The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine, 12(3), pp. 45–58.
Formats any DOI in the closest standard style — The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine has no published style definition, so this is an approximation. No sign-up. |
| Publishes research in | Ethics in medical practice Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare Mental Health and Psychiatry Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations Biomedical Ethics and Regulation |
| ISSN | 0360-5310 |
| Citation impact (2-yr) | 1.81 |
| h-index | 89 |
| i10-index | 973 |
| Total citations | 42,435 |
| Top institutions publishing here | Georgetown University |
| Journal website | www.tandf.co.uk |
| You get | A submission-ready PDF and the editable LaTeX source — ready to submit. |
Citations each year’s papers have accumulated so far — the most recent years are still building up.
The authors use the term "principlism" to refer to the practice of using "principles" to replace both moral theory and particular moral rules and ideals in dealing with the moral problems that arise in medical practice. The authors argue that these "principles" do not function as claimed, and that their use is misleading both practically…
How physicians approach patients and the problems they present is much influenced by the conceptual models around which their knowledge is organized. In this paper the implications of the biopsychosocial model for the study and care of a patient with an acute myocardial infarction are presented and contrasted with approaches used by adherents of the…
The mainstream rationale for equating "brain death" (BD) with death is that the brain confers integrative unity upon the body, transforming it from a mere collection of organs and tissues to an "organism as a whole." In support of this conclusion, the impressive list of the brain's myriad integrative functions is often cited. Upon closer…
The rhetoric of the social model of disability is presented, and its basic claims are critiqued. Proponents of the social model use the distinction between impairment and disability to reduce disabilities to a single social dimension-social oppression. They downplay the role of biological and mental conditions in the lives of disabled people. Consequences of denying…
This essay replies to critics since 1995 of my "biostatistical theory" (BST) of health. According to the BST, a pathological condition is a state of statistically species-subnormal biological part-functional ability, relative to sex and age. Theoretical health, the total absence of pathological conditions, is then a value-free scientific notion. Recent critics offer a mixture of…
