The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science Template
Write in a clean editor, then format for The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science in one click — DocuGuru applies the official Oxford University Press template with author–year references and exports a submission-ready PDF plus the editable LaTeX source. Free to start.
About the The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science format
The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science is a peer-reviewed journal published by Oxford University Press, covering Philosophy and History of Science, Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics, Philosophy and Theoretical Science.
| Publisher | Oxford University Press |
|---|---|
| Reference style | Author–year (OUP) Author–year — (Smith, 2023) in the text Smith, A., Jones, B. and Lee, C. (2023) 'A representative article title', The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 12(3), pp. 45–58.
Formats any DOI in the closest standard style — The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science has no published style definition, so this is an approximation. No sign-up. |
| Publishes research in | Philosophy and History of Science Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics Philosophy and Theoretical Science Quantum Mechanics and Applications Science and Climate Studies |
| ISSN | 0007-0882 |
| Citation impact (2-yr) | 1.96 |
| h-index | 132 |
| i10-index | 1,510 |
| Total citations | 91,843 |
| Top institutions publishing here | London School of Economics and Political Science |
| Journal website | bjps.oxfordjournals.org |
| You get | A submission-ready PDF and the editable LaTeX source — ready to submit. |
Papers published in The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science per year
Citation impact of The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science by publication year
Citations each year’s papers have accumulated so far — the most recent years are still building up.
Most-cited papers in The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
We propose a new definition of actual causes, using structural equations to model counterfactuals. We show that the definition yields a plausible and elegant account of causation that handles well examples which have caused problems for other definitions and resolves major difficulties in the traditional account. 1. Introduction2. Causal models: a review2.1Causal models2.2Syntax and semantics3. The definition of…
Traditional analyses of the curve fitting problem maintain that the data do not indicate what form the fitted curve should take. Rather, this issue is said to be settled by prior probabilities, by simplicity, or by a background theory. In this paper, we describe a result due to Akaike [1973], which shows how the data…