Write in a clean editor, then format for Journal of Forest Economics in one click — DocuGuru applies the official Elsevier template with author–year references and exports a submission-ready PDF plus the editable LaTeX source. Free to start.
Journal of Forest Economics is a peer-reviewed journal published by Elsevier, covering Forest Management and Policy, Economic and Environmental Valuation, Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management.
| Publisher | Elsevier |
|---|---|
| Reference style | Author–year (Harvard) Author–year — (Smith, 2023) in the text Smith, A., Jones, B. and Lee, C. (2023) 'A representative article title', Journal of Forest Economics, 12(3), pp. 45–58.
Formats any DOI in Journal of Forest Economics style. No sign-up. |
| Publishes research in | Forest Management and Policy Economic and Environmental Valuation Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management Forest Biomass Utilization and Management Forest ecology and management |
| ISSN | 1104-6899 |
| Citation impact (2-yr) | 0.35 |
| h-index | 51 |
| i10-index | 340 |
| Total citations | 12,530 |
| Top institutions publishing here | Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences |
| Journal website | www.journals.elsevier.com |
| You get | A submission-ready PDF and the editable LaTeX source — ready to submit. |
Citations each year’s papers have accumulated so far — the most recent years are still building up.
Republished with permisson from Commonwealth Forestry Association. The original article “Berechnung des Wertes welchen Waldboden sowie noch nicht haubare Holzbestände für die Waldwirtschaft besitzen” was published in Allgemeine Forst- und Jagd-Zeitung, vol.15, 1849. The following translation was published in Gane, M. (editor) and Linnard, W. (transl.): “Martin Faustmann and the Evolution of Discounted Cash Flow:…
Program circulates these working papers to convey information and entertain discussion. The papers may not have undergone formal peer review. Contact Subhrendu Pattanayak
This research utilises two valuation techniques (a frequency-based choice experiment model and a contingent behaviour model) to value a range of improvements to recreational facilities in forest and woodlands in Great Britain. We provide the first comparison in the literature of welfare results from these two approaches. Four groups of forest users are targeted in…
There is a growing concern that human health impacts from exposure to wildfire smoke are ignored in estimates of monetized damages from wildfires. Current research highlights the need for better data collection and analysis of these impacts. Using unique primary data, this paper quantifies the economic cost of health effects from the largest wildfire in…
