Social Science History Template
Write in a clean editor, then format for Social Science History in one click — DocuGuru applies the official Cambridge University Press template with numbered references and exports a submission-ready PDF plus the editable LaTeX source. Free to start.
About the Social Science History format
Social Science History is a peer-reviewed journal published by Cambridge University Press, covering Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies, Historical Economic and Social Studies, Educational Robotics and Engineering.
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
|---|---|
| Reference style | Numbered Numbered — [1], [2] in the text [1] A. Smith, B. Jones, and C. Lee, A representative article title, Social Science History 12 (2023) 45–58.
Formats any DOI in the closest standard style — Social Science History has no published style definition, so this is an approximation. No sign-up. |
| Publishes research in | Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies Historical Economic and Social Studies Educational Robotics and Engineering Race, History, and American Society American Constitutional Law and Politics |
| ISSN | 0145-5532 |
| Citation impact (2-yr) | 0.98 |
| h-index | 62 |
| i10-index | 669 |
| Total citations | 27,149 |
| Top institutions publishing here | University of Michigan |
| Journal website | www.cambridge.org |
| You get | A submission-ready PDF and the editable LaTeX source — ready to submit. |
Papers published in Social Science History per year
Citation impact of Social Science History by publication year
Citations each year’s papers have accumulated so far — the most recent years are still building up.
Most-cited papers in Social Science History
Moments of madness—when “all is possible”—recur persistently in the history of social movements. In such turbulent points of history, writes Aristide Zolberg, “the wall between the instrumental and the expressive collapses.” “Politics bursts its bounds to invade all of life” and “political animals somehow transcend their fate” (1972: 183). Such moments are unsettling and often…
The nineteenth-century English working class bears a most peculiar burden and embodies a most peculiar paradox. Like Auden’s academic warriors who spar with “smiles and Christian names,” historians, economists, and sociologists have pushed and prodded early nineteenth-century English working people into procrustean political positions to support or disconfirm Marx’s predictions of revolutionary class conflict erupting…
A quick comparison of characteristic British struggles in 1758 and 1833 will show how greatly the predominant forms of popular collective action changed during the intervening 75 years. That change sets a research problem that I have been pursuing for many years: documenting, and trying to explain, changes in the ways that people act together…
Sometime After 1968, analysts and participants began to speak of “new social movements” that worked outside formal institutional channels and emphasized lifestyle, ethical, or “identity” concerns rather than narrowly economic goals. A variety of examples informed the conceptualization. Alberto Melucci (1988: 247), for instance, cited feminism, the ecology movement or “greens,” the peace movement, and…