Write in a clean editor, then format for Journal of Germanic Linguistics in one click — DocuGuru applies the official Cambridge University Press template with numbered references and exports a submission-ready PDF plus the editable LaTeX source. Free to start.
Journal of Germanic Linguistics is a peer-reviewed journal published by Cambridge University Press, covering Linguistic Variation and Morphology, Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation, Linguistics and language evolution.
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
|---|---|
| Reference style | Numbered Numbered — [1], [2] in the text [1] A. Smith, B. Jones, and C. Lee, A representative article title, Journal of Germanic Linguistics 12 (2023) 45–58.
Formats any DOI in the closest standard style — Journal of Germanic Linguistics has no published style definition, so this is an approximation. No sign-up. |
| Publishes research in | Linguistic Variation and Morphology Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation Linguistics and language evolution Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies Human auditory perception and evaluation |
| ISSN | 1470-5427 |
| Citation impact (2-yr) | 0.63 |
| h-index | 30 |
| i10-index | 96 |
| Total citations | 3,981 |
| Top institutions publishing here | Pennsylvania State University |
| Journal website | journals.cambridge.org |
| You get | A submission-ready PDF and the editable LaTeX source — ready to submit. |
Citations each year’s papers have accumulated so far — the most recent years are still building up.
In this paper we argue for the following properties of clause-bound scrambling, as they are manifested in German. First, scrambling presupposes head-final projections. Only selected constituents, notably arguments, scramble, the reason being that phrases selected by a head have a unique base order. Second, scrambling involves antecedent-gap dependencies with A-chain properties. Third, scrambling is overt…
Syntactic constructions may form an alternative to, or compete with the morphological expression of semantic and grammatical content. This applies to the passive forms of verbs, the progressive form, analytic causatives, adjective-noun sequences, and particle verbs in Dutch. In this article I develop a view of the Dutch lexicon in which this interaction between syntax…
This paper discusses the auxiliated posture verb constructions in Dutch (liggen/zitten/staan+te+V ‘sit/lie/stand to V’) that have progressive, durative, or habitual interpretation. My analysis, based on a large corpus of written texts, reveals, first of all, that to a large extent these constructions follow the regular (that is, non-aspectual) use of the three cardinal posture verbs…
In this paper, I provide examples from Germanic of cyclical changes involving the nominal phrase. Using a DP structure, it can be observed that demonstratives in specifier positions of the DP are reanalyzed through time as articles in head positions. The change from demonstrative to article is known as the definiteness cycle and described in…
This study reports on a number of highly significant differences found between English, German, and Dutch hesitation markers. English and German native speakers used significantly more vocalic-nasal hesitation markers than Dutch native speakers, who used predominantly vocalic hesitation markers. English hesitation markers occurred most frequently when preceded by silence and followed by a lexical item,…
