Nonhuman animal ("animal") experimentation is typically defended by arguments that it is reliable, that animals provide sufficiently good models of human biology and diseases to yield relevant information, and that, consequently, its use provides major human health benefits. I demonstrate that a growing body of scientific literature critically assessing the validity of animal experimentation generally…
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics Template
Write in a clean editor, then format for Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics in one click — DocuGuru applies the official Cambridge University Press template with numbered references and exports a submission-ready PDF plus the editable LaTeX source. Free to start.
About the Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics format
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics is a peer-reviewed journal published by Cambridge University Press, covering Ethics in medical practice, Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare, Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies.
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
|---|---|
| Reference style | Numbered Numbered — [1], [2] in the text [1] A. Smith, B. Jones, and C. Lee, A representative article title, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 12 (2023) 45–58.
Formats any DOI in the closest standard style — Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics has no published style definition, so this is an approximation. No sign-up. |
| Publishes research in | Ethics in medical practice Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies Human auditory perception and evaluation Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues |
| ISSN | 0963-1801 |
| Citation impact (2-yr) | 1.43 |
| h-index | 61 |
| i10-index | 662 |
| Total citations | 24,193 |
| Top institutions publishing here | Institute of Medical Ethics |
| Journal website | journals.cambridge.org |
| You get | A submission-ready PDF and the editable LaTeX source — ready to submit. |
Papers published in Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics per year
Citation impact of Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics by publication year
Citations each year’s papers have accumulated so far — the most recent years are still building up.
Most-cited papers in Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics
The treatment-enhancement distinction draws a line between services or interventions meant to prevent or cure (or otherwise ameliorate) conditions that we view as diseases or disabilities and interventions that improve a condition that we view as a normal function or feature of members of our species. The line drawn here is widely appealed to in…
The practice of obtaining informed consent has its history in, and gains its meaning from, medicine and biomedical research. Discussions of disclosure and justified nondisclosure have played a significant role throughout the history of medical ethics, but the term “informed consent” emerged only in the 1950s. Serious discussion of the meaning and ethics of informed…
The Object of Morality is the title of a book I wrote a good many years ago shortly before I deviated irreversibly into university administration (often an intellectually terminal condition). I do not want to plug that book; nevertheless, it may not be completely irrelevant to say something of what it was about and take…
As healthcare institutions expand and vertically integrate, healthcare delivery is less constrained by geography, nationality, or even by institutional boundaries. As part of this trend, some aspects of the healthcare process are shifted from medical centers back into the home and communities. Telehealth applications intended for health promotion, social services, and other activities—for the healthy…