Write in a clean editor, then format for Cambridge Archaeological Journal in one click — DocuGuru applies the official Cambridge University Press template with numbered references and exports a submission-ready PDF plus the editable LaTeX source. Free to start.
Cambridge Archaeological Journal is a peer-reviewed journal published by Cambridge University Press, covering Archaeology and ancient environmental studies, Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology, Archaeology and Rock Art Studies.
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
|---|---|
| Reference style | Numbered Numbered — [1], [2] in the text [1] A. Smith, B. Jones, and C. Lee, A representative article title, Cambridge Archaeological Journal 12 (2023) 45–58.
Formats any DOI in the closest standard style — Cambridge Archaeological Journal has no published style definition, so this is an approximation. No sign-up. |
| Publishes research in | Archaeology and ancient environmental studies Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology Archaeology and Rock Art Studies Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies |
| ISSN | 0959-7743 |
| Citation impact (2-yr) | 1.07 |
| h-index | 83 |
| i10-index | 550 |
| Total citations | 29,684 |
| Top institutions publishing here | University of Cambridge |
| Journal website | journals.cambridge.org |
| You get | A submission-ready PDF and the editable LaTeX source — ready to submit. |
Citations each year’s papers have accumulated so far — the most recent years are still building up.
In recent years there has been a major growth of interest in exploring the analogies between the genetic transmission of information from one generation to the next and the processes of cultural transmission, in an attempt to obtain a greater understanding of how culture change occurs. This article uses computer simulation to explore the implications…
How should archaeologists approach ethnicity? This concept, which has such wide currency in social and anthropological studies, remains elusive when we seek to apply it to the archaeological past. The importance of ethnicity in our late twentieth-century world can easily lead us to believe that it must long have been a key element in human…
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
The origins and evolution of modern humans has been the dominant interest in palaeoanthropology for the last decade, and much archaeological interpretation has been structured around the various issues associated with whether humans have a recent African origin or a more ancient one. While the archaeological record has been used to support or refute various…
This contribution explores modes of human–animal interactions in hunter-gatherer communities in near-contemporary eastern Siberia and the Mesolithic of northwest Europe. By discussing notions of care and control and drawing on syntheses of Russian-language ethnographic data from eastern Siberia, this paper explores the diversity and nuances of hunter-gatherers’ interactions with animals. While some contexts may reveal…
