Write in a clean editor, then format for Behavioural Public Policy in one click — DocuGuru applies the official Cambridge University Press template with numbered references and exports a submission-ready PDF plus the editable LaTeX source. Free to start.
Behavioural Public Policy is a peer-reviewed journal published by Cambridge University Press, covering Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics, Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies, Behavioral Health and Interventions.
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
|---|---|
| Reference style | Numbered Numbered — [1], [2] in the text [1] A. Smith, B. Jones, and C. Lee, A representative article title, Behavioural Public Policy 12 (2023) 45–58.
Formats any DOI in the closest standard style — Behavioural Public Policy has no published style definition, so this is an approximation. No sign-up. |
| Publishes research in | Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies Behavioral Health and Interventions Environmental Education and Sustainability Economic and Environmental Valuation |
| ISSN | 2398-063X |
| Citation impact (2-yr) | 3.13 |
| h-index | 40 |
| i10-index | 148 |
| Total citations | 7,794 |
| Top institutions publishing here | London School of Economics and Political Science |
| Journal website | www.cambridge.org |
| You get | A submission-ready PDF and the editable LaTeX source — ready to submit. |
Citations each year’s papers have accumulated so far — the most recent years are still building up.
Abstract This paper evaluates the state of contact hypothesis research from a policy perspective. Building on Pettigrew and Tropp's (2006) influential meta-analysis, we assemble all intergroup contact studies that feature random assignment and delayed outcome measures, of which there are 27 in total, nearly two-thirds of which were published following the original review. We find…
Abstract Why does public conflict over societal risks persist in the face of compelling and widely accessible scientific evidence? We conducted an experiment to probe two alternative answers: the ‘science comprehension thesis’ (SCT), which identifies defects in the public's knowledge and reasoning capacities as the source of such controversies; and the ‘identity-protective cognition thesis’ (ICT),…
Abstract Why are some nudges ineffective, or at least less effective than choice architects hope and expect? Focusing primarily on default rules, this essay emphasizes two reasons for this. The first involves strong antecedent preferences on the part of choosers. The second involves successful “counternudges,” which persuade people to choose in a way that confounds…
Abstract Conventional economic policy focuses on ‘economic’ solutions (e.g. taxes, incentives, regulation) to problems caused by market-level factors such as externalities, misaligned incentives and information asymmetries. By contrast, ‘nudges’ provide behavioural solutions to problems that have generally been assumed to originate from limitations in human decision making, such as present bias. While policy-makers have good…
Abstract Reducing global warming will require enacting strong climate policies, which is unlikely to happen without public support. While prior research has identified varied predictors of climate change policy support, it is unclear which predictors are strongest for the American electorate as a whole, and which predictors are strongest for Democrats and Republicans. In a…
