Write in a clean editor, then format for Research Integrity and Peer Review in one click — DocuGuru applies the official BMC (BioMed Central) template with numbered references and exports a submission-ready PDF plus the editable LaTeX source. Free to start.
Research Integrity and Peer Review is a peer-reviewed journal published by BMC (BioMed Central), covering Meta-analysis and systematic reviews, Academic integrity and plagiarism, scientometrics and bibliometrics research. Over its lifetime it has published 225 papers, which have received 10,095 citations.
| Publisher | BMC (BioMed Central) |
|---|---|
| Reference style | Numbered (Vancouver) Numbered — [1], [2] in the text 1. Smith A, Jones B, Lee C. A representative article title. Research Integrity and Peer Review. 2023;12(3):45–58.
Formats any DOI in Research Integrity and Peer Review style. No sign-up. |
| Publishes research in | Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Academic integrity and plagiarism scientometrics and bibliometrics research Academic Publishing and Open Access Ethics in Clinical Research |
| ISSN | 2058-8615 |
| Citation impact (2-yr) | 2.5 |
| h-index | 39 |
| i10-index | 105 |
| Article processing charge | $1,827 |
| Open access | Yes — indexed in DOAJ |
| Top institutions publishing here | Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam |
| Journal website | researchintegrityjournal.biomedcentral.com |
| You get | A submission-ready PDF and the editable LaTeX source — ready to submit. |
Citations each year’s papers have accumulated so far — the most recent years are still building up.
BACKGROUND: Sex and gender differences are often overlooked in research design, study implementation and scientific reporting, as well as in general science communication. This oversight limits the generalizability of research findings and their applicability to clinical practice, in particular for women but also for men. This article describes the rationale for an international set of…
Peer review is embedded in the core of our knowledge generation systems, perceived as a method for establishing quality or scholarly legitimacy for research, while also often distributing academic prestige and standing on individuals. Despite its critical importance, it curiously remains poorly understood in a number of dimensions. In order to address this, we have…
BACKGROUND: The amount and value of researchers' peer review work is critical for academia and journal publishing. However, this labor is under-recognized, its magnitude is unknown, and alternative ways of organizing peer review labor are rarely considered. METHODS: Using publicly available data, we provide an estimate of researchers' time and the salary-based contribution to the…
BACKGROUND: Codes of conduct mainly focus on research misconduct that takes the form of fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism. However, at the aggregate level, lesser forms of research misbehavior may be more important due to their much higher prevalence. Little is known about what the most frequent research misbehaviors are and what their impact is if…
BACKGROUND: The emergence of systems based on large language models (LLMs) such as OpenAI's ChatGPT has created a range of discussions in scholarly circles. Since LLMs generate grammatically correct and mostly relevant (yet sometimes outright wrong, irrelevant or biased) outputs in response to provided prompts, using them in various writing tasks including writing peer review…
