Write in a clean editor, then format for Environmental Evidence in one click — DocuGuru applies the official BMC (BioMed Central) template with numbered references and exports a submission-ready PDF plus the editable LaTeX source. Free to start.
Environmental Evidence is a peer-reviewed journal published by BMC (BioMed Central), covering Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management, Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies, Species Distribution and Climate Change. Over its lifetime it has published 426 papers, which have received 16,706 citations.
| Publisher | BMC (BioMed Central) |
|---|---|
| Reference style | Numbered (Vancouver) Numbered — [1], [2] in the text 1. Smith A, Jones B, Lee C. A representative article title. Environmental Evidence. 2023;12(3):45–58.
Formats any DOI in Environmental Evidence style. No sign-up. |
| Publishes research in | Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies Species Distribution and Climate Change Land Use and Ecosystem Services Wildlife Ecology and Conservation |
| ISSN | 2047-2382 |
| Citation impact (2-yr) | 5.28 |
| h-index | 66 |
| i10-index | 281 |
| Article processing charge | $2,072 |
| Open access | Yes — indexed in DOAJ |
| Top institutions publishing here | Stockholm Environment Institute |
| Journal website | link.springer.com |
| You get | A submission-ready PDF and the editable LaTeX source — ready to submit. |
Citations each year’s papers have accumulated so far — the most recent years are still building up.
Systematic mapping was developed in social sciences in response to a lack of empirical data when answering questions using systematic review methods, and a need for a method to describe the literature across a broad subject of interest. Systematic mapping does not attempt to answer a specific question as do systematic reviews, but instead collates,…
Abstract Background Global policy initiatives and international conservation organizations have sought to emphasize and strengthen the link between the conservation of natural ecosystems and human development. While many indices have been developed to measure various social outcomes to conservation interventions, the quantity and strength of evidence to support the effects, both positive and negative, of…
BACKGROUND: Among the most widely predicted climate change-related impacts to biodiversity are geographic range shifts, whereby species shift their spatial distribution to track their climate niches. A series of commonly articulated hypotheses have emerged in the scientific literature suggesting species are expected to shift their distributions to higher latitudes, greater elevations, and deeper depths in…
Establishing Protected Areas (PAs) is among the most common conservation interventions. Protecting areas from the threats posed by human activity will by definition inhibit some human actions. However, adverse impacts could be balanced by maintaining ecosystem services or introducing new livelihood options. Consequently there is an ongoing debate on whether the net impact of PAs…
Meta-analysis is a quantitative way of synthesizing results from multiple studies to obtain reliable evidence of an intervention or phenomenon. Indeed, an increasing number of meta-analyses are conducted in environmental sciences, and resulting meta-analytic evidence is often used in environmental policies and decision-making. We conducted a survey of recent meta-analyses in environmental sciences and found…
